Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs GLM 5.2
One line per model: the best value available from any of its providers at each point, which is what a caller routing to the healthy endpoint would see.
CompareLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2GLM 5.2
| Model | Providers | Best uptime | Fastest p50 | Best p99 | Throughput | Context | Cheapest $/Mtok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 | 1/2 | 100% DeepInfra | 276ms DeepInfra | 2.03s DeepInfra | 52 tps DeepInfra | 131K | $0.850 / $0.850 DeepInfra |
| GLM 5.2 | 25/31 | 100% Alibaba | 547ms Friendli | 4.18s Cloudflare | 108 tps Friendli | 1.0M | $0.420 / $1.32 Baidu |
Measured 2m ago. Each figure is the best available across that model's providers.
History
Availability
Best uptime available from any provider. Axis starts at 90%; it expands to 0 when a model falls below.
Time to first token
Fastest p50 available from any provider. Logarithmic axis.
Throughput
Best median tokens per second available.