Trinity Large Thinking vs GLM 5.2
One line per model: the best value available from any of its providers at each point, which is what a caller routing to the healthy endpoint would see.
CompareTrinity Large ThinkingGLM 5.2
| Model | Providers | Best uptime | Fastest p50 | Best p99 | Throughput | Context | Cheapest $/Mtok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2/2 | 100% Arcee AI | 173ms Parasail | 1.14s Arcee AI | 69 tps Parasail | 262K | $0.220 / $0.850 Parasail |
| GLM 5.2 | 21/31 | 100% AtlasCloud | 706ms Together | 6.56s AtlasCloud | 98 tps BaseTen | 1.0M | $0.420 / $1.32 Baidu |
Measured 4m ago. Each figure is the best available across that model's providers.
History
Availability
Best uptime available from any provider. Axis starts at 90%; it expands to 0 when a model falls below.
Time to first token
Fastest p50 available from any provider. Logarithmic axis.
Throughput
Best median tokens per second available.