modelstatus.dev

← Saba

Saba: providers compared

Every endpoint serving this model, side by side. ◆ marks the best value in each column — per model, never fleet-wide.

  • No data24h 100%
    7d
    100%◆ (best)
    30d
    99.96%
    p50
    474ms◆ (best)
    p99
    1.80s◆ (best)
    Throughput
    50 tps
    Context
    33K
    $/Mtok
    $0.200 / $0.600◆ (best)
    mistral
  • No data24h —
    7d
    100%◆ (best)
    30d
    100%◆ (best)
    p50
    —
    p99
    —
    Throughput
    —
    Context
    33K
    $/Mtok
    $0.220 / $0.660
    mistral/eu
  • No data24h 100%
    7d
    100%◆ (best)
    30d
    99.97%
    p50
    488ms
    p99
    1.83s
    Throughput
    55 tps◆ (best)
    Context
    33K
    $/Mtok
    $0.200 / $0.600◆ (best)
    mistral/zdr

Measured 1m ago. Latency and throughput are OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute windows. ◆ marks the best value in each column among these endpoints.

Price vs latency

One dot per endpoint at the latest round · further left = faster, lower = cheaper · hover a dot for its tag

History

Availability

Axis starts at 90% so small differences stay visible; it expands to 0 when an endpoint falls below.

Time to first token

Logarithmic axis — the fleet spans two orders of magnitude. P50 is OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute window.

Throughput

Median tokens per second.