modelstatus.dev

← Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: providers compared

Every endpoint serving this model, side by side. ◆ marks the best value in each column — per model, never fleet-wide.

  • Healthy24h 99.93%
    7d
    99.70%◆ (best)
    30d
    99.25%◆ (best)
    p50
    218ms◆ (best)
    p99
    3.07s
    Throughput
    39 tps◆ (best)
    Context
    131K
    $/Mtok
    $0.850 / $0.850◆ (best)
    deepinfra/fp8fp8
  • No data24h 99.91%
    7d
    97.84%
    30d
    95.60%
    p50
    562ms
    p99
    1.13s◆ (best)
    Throughput
    34 tps
    Context
    8K
    $/Mtok
    $1.45 / $1.45
    novita/fp8fp8

Measured 3m ago. Latency and throughput are OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute windows. ◆ marks the best value in each column among these endpoints.

Price vs latency

One dot per endpoint at the latest round · further left = faster, lower = cheaper · hover a dot for its tag

History

Availability

Axis starts at 90% so small differences stay visible; it expands to 0 when an endpoint falls below.

Time to first token

Logarithmic axis — the fleet spans two orders of magnitude. P50 is OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute window.

Throughput

Median tokens per second.