Mercury 2 vs Kimi K2.6
One line per model: the best value available from any of its providers at each point, which is what a caller routing to the healthy endpoint would see.
CompareMercury 2Kimi K2.6
| Model | Providers | Best uptime | Fastest p50 | Best p99 | Throughput | Context | Cheapest $/Mtok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2 | 1/1 | 100% Inception | 867ms Inception | 8.00s Inception | 168 tps Inception | 128K | $0.250 / $0.750 Inception |
| Kimi K2.6 | 16/21 | 100% Baidu | 380ms Together | 1.70s Together | 167 tps CoreWeave | 262K | $0.541 / $2.28 Baidu |
Measured 4m ago. Each figure is the best available across that model's providers.
History
Availability
Best uptime available from any provider. Axis starts at 90%; it expands to 0 when a model falls below.
Time to first token
Fastest p50 available from any provider. Logarithmic axis.
Throughput
Best median tokens per second available.