modelstatus.dev

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Saba

One line per model: the best value available from any of its providers at each point, which is what a caller routing to the healthy endpoint would see.

CompareMistral Medium 3.1Saba
Mistral Medium 3.13/3
100%
99.82%
99.89%
396ms
7.25s
134 tps
131K
$0.400 / $2.00
Saba0/3
—
—
—
—
—
—
33K
$0.200 / $0.600

Measured 2m ago. Each figure is the best available across that model's providers.

Availability

Best uptime available from any provider. Axis starts at 90%; it expands to 0 when a model falls below.

Time to first token

Fastest P50 available from any provider. Logarithmic axis.

Throughput

Best median tokens per second available.