Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs GLM 5.3
One line per model: the best value available from any of its providers at each point, which is what a caller routing to the healthy endpoint would see.
CompareLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2GLM 5.3
| Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 | 1/2 | 100% | 99.70% | 99.26% | 186ms | 2.31s | 40 tps | 131K | $0.850 / $0.850 |
| GLM 5.3 | 28/53 | 100% | 99.98% | 99.98% | 293ms | 2.27s | 224 tps | 1.0M | $0.060 / $8.00 |
Measured 2m ago. Each figure is the best available across that model's providers.
History
Availability
Best uptime available from any provider. Axis starts at 90%; it expands to 0 when a model falls below.
Time to first token
Fastest P50 available from any provider. Logarithmic axis.
Throughput
Best median tokens per second available.