Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.2
One line per model: the best value available from any of its providers at each point, which is what a caller routing to the healthy endpoint would see.
CompareSolar Pro 4GLM 5.2
| Model | Providers | Best uptime | Fastest p50 | Best p99 | Throughput | Context | Cheapest $/Mtok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solar Pro 4 | 1/1 | 100% Upstage | 2.86s Upstage | 27.9s Upstage | 23 tps Upstage | 524K | $0.030 / $0.120 Upstage |
| GLM 5.2 | 24/31 | 100% Ambient | 618ms Together | 3.66s Cloudflare | 98 tps BaseTen | 1.0M | $0.420 / $1.32 Baidu |
Measured 2m ago. Each figure is the best available across that model's providers.
History
Availability
Best uptime available from any provider. Axis starts at 90%; it expands to 0 when a model falls below.
Time to first token
Fastest p50 available from any provider. Logarithmic axis.
Throughput
Best median tokens per second available.