modelstatus.dev

Mistral Small 4

Mistral Small 4: providers compared

Every endpoint serving this model, side by side. ◆ marks the best value in each column — per model, never fleet-wide.

  • Mistral100% (best)
    Healthy24h 99.82%
    7d
    99.69%
    30d
    99.69%
    p50
    489ms (best)
    p99
    7.45s
    Throughput
    105 tps
    Context
    262K
    $/Mtok
    $0.150 / $0.600 (best)
    mistral
  • Venice99.34%
    Healthy24h 99.92%
    7d
    99.89% (best)
    30d
    99.89% (best)
    p50
    592ms
    p99
    5.66s (best)
    Throughput
    86 tps
    Context
    256K
    $/Mtok
    $0.188 / $0.750
    venice/fp8fp8
  • No data24h 0.00%
    7d
    0.00%
    30d
    0.00%
    p50
    8.16s
    p99
    15.4s
    Throughput
    162 tps (best)
    Context
    262K
    $/Mtok
    $0.165 / $0.660
    mistral/zdr

Measured 3m ago. Latency and throughput are OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute windows. ◆ marks the best value in each column among these endpoints.

Price vs latency

One dot per endpoint at the latest round · further left = faster, lower = cheaper · hover a dot for its tag

History

Availability

Axis starts at 90% so small differences stay visible; it expands to 0 when an endpoint falls below.

Time to first token

Logarithmic axis — the fleet spans two orders of magnitude. P50 is OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute window.

Throughput

Median tokens per second.