GLM 5: providers compared
Every endpoint serving this model, side by side. ◆ marks the best value in each column — per model, never fleet-wide.
Current state
| State | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Bedrockamazon-bedrock | Healthy | 100%◆ (best) | 96.22% | 97.65% | 97.65% | 727ms◆ (best) | 5.00s | 7.0 tps | 203K | $1.00 / $3.20 |
| Healthy | 100%◆ (best) | 99.88% | 99.87% | 99.87% | 1.18s | 4.14s◆ (best) | 44 tps | 203K | $0.700 / $2.24 | |
| Healthy | 100%◆ (best) | 99.84% | 99.41% | 99.41% | 812ms | 25.2s | 27 tps | 203K | $0.600 / $2.08◆ (best) | |
| Healthy | 100%◆ (best) | 99.75% | 99.59% | 99.59% | 1.12s | 4.24s | 53 tps | 203K | $0.600 / $1.92◆ (best) | |
| Healthy | 100%◆ (best) | 99.93% | 99.95% | 99.95% | 2.47s | 6.37s | 45 tps | 198K | $0.600 / $1.92◆ (best) | |
| Healthy | 100%◆ (best) | 99.98% | 99.87% | 99.87% | 961ms | 4.42s | 62 tps | 203K | $1.00 / $3.20 | |
| No data | — | 99.79% | 99.82% | 99.82% | 1.97s | 21.2s | 42 tps | 203K | $0.950 / $3.15 | |
DigitalOceandigitalocean | No data | — | 96.03% | 93.73% | 93.73% | 1.45s | 9.89s | 7.0 tps | 64K | $1.00 / $3.20 |
| No data | — | 99.97% | 99.99%◆ (best) | 99.99%◆ (best) | 2.29s | 8.16s | 63 tps◆ (best) | 203K | $1.00 / $3.20 | |
| No data | — | 99.84% | 99.71% | 99.71% | 2.27s | 10.6s | 38 tps | 205K | $0.950 / $2.55 | |
| No data | — | 96.14% | 93.80% | 93.80% | 1.15s | 4.82s | 31 tps | 198K | $1.00 / $3.20 |
- Amazon Bedrock100%◆ (best)Healthy24h 96.22%
- 7d
- 97.65%
- 30d
- 97.65%
- p50
- 727ms◆ (best)
- p99
- 5.00s
- Throughput
- 7.0 tps
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $1.00 / $3.20
amazon-bedrock - Baidu100%◆ (best)Healthy24h 99.88%
- 7d
- 99.87%
- 30d
- 99.87%
- p50
- 1.18s
- p99
- 4.14s◆ (best)
- Throughput
- 44 tps
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $0.700 / $2.24
baidu/fp8fp8 - DeepInfra100%◆ (best)Healthy24h 99.84%
- 7d
- 99.41%
- 30d
- 99.41%
- p50
- 812ms
- p99
- 25.2s
- Throughput
- 27 tps
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $0.600 / $2.08◆ (best)
deepinfra/fp4fp4 - GMICloud100%◆ (best)Healthy24h 99.75%
- 7d
- 99.59%
- 30d
- 99.59%
- p50
- 1.12s
- p99
- 4.24s
- Throughput
- 53 tps
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $0.600 / $1.92◆ (best)
gmicloud/fp8fp8 - StreamLake100%◆ (best)Healthy24h 99.93%
- 7d
- 99.95%
- 30d
- 99.95%
- p50
- 2.47s
- p99
- 6.37s
- Throughput
- 45 tps
- Context
- 198K
- $/Mtok
- $0.600 / $1.92◆ (best)
streamlake/fp8fp8 - Z.AI100%◆ (best)Healthy24h 99.98%
- 7d
- 99.87%
- 30d
- 99.87%
- p50
- 961ms
- p99
- 4.42s
- Throughput
- 62 tps
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $1.00 / $3.20
z-ai/fp8fp8 - No data24h 99.79%
- 7d
- 99.82%
- 30d
- 99.82%
- p50
- 1.97s
- p99
- 21.2s
- Throughput
- 42 tps
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $0.950 / $3.15
atlas-cloud/fp8fp8 - No data24h 96.03%
- 7d
- 93.73%
- 30d
- 93.73%
- p50
- 1.45s
- p99
- 9.89s
- Throughput
- 7.0 tps
- Context
- 64K
- $/Mtok
- $1.00 / $3.20
digitalocean - No data24h 99.97%
- 7d
- 99.99%◆ (best)
- 30d
- 99.99%◆ (best)
- p50
- 2.29s
- p99
- 8.16s
- Throughput
- 63 tps◆ (best)
- Context
- 203K
- $/Mtok
- $1.00 / $3.20
novita/fp8fp8 - No data24h 99.84%
- 7d
- 99.71%
- 30d
- 99.71%
- p50
- 2.27s
- p99
- 10.6s
- Throughput
- 38 tps
- Context
- 205K
- $/Mtok
- $0.950 / $2.55
siliconflow/fp8fp8 - No data24h 96.14%
- 7d
- 93.80%
- 30d
- 93.80%
- p50
- 1.15s
- p99
- 4.82s
- Throughput
- 31 tps
- Context
- 198K
- $/Mtok
- $1.00 / $3.20
venice/fp8fp8
Measured 5m ago. Latency and throughput are OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute windows. ◆ marks the best value in each column among these endpoints.
Price vs latency
One dot per endpoint at the latest round · further left = faster, lower = cheaper · hover a dot for its tag
History
Availability
Axis starts at 90% so small differences stay visible; it expands to 0 when an endpoint falls below.
Time to first token
Logarithmic axis — the fleet spans two orders of magnitude. P50 is OpenRouter's rolling 30-minute window, averaged over the hour.
Throughput
Median tokens per second.